Dia Media

  • Home
  • Blog

Pricing – to Share or Not to Share

May 8, 2019 by MzD

So I wrote this draft so long ago, it’s comical. And it doesn’t really end. But my thoughts remain similar. For giggles, I’m going to publish it, seeing as I’ve just turned comments off and it no longer will be a magnet for all that noise. Instead it will hopefully push me to blog more and start that workshop on pricing I want to do. Cheers.”

Just give me Money
Just give me Money

Money is a really delicate subject. More so amongst Canadians than Americans, if my personal small sampling counts as an accurate take on the pulse of money.  Probably a leftover from our Rule Brittania days, stiff upper lip and all that colonizer madness.

I’ve read blogs and books that strongly advocate to never disclose your pricing in your marketing materials when you’re in the service industry (this obviously would not be the strategy if your business is a restaurant) and also read the exact opposite advice – that showing your prices attracts clients.

We had a pricing blurb up for a while – I think it attracted bottom feeders.

Recently a programmer we work with told me he is going to raise his rates. I was not surprised, in fact, I wondered why he hadn’t done this sooner. On the other hand, when I compare him with another professional we work with, whose rates were triple that of the programmer (on an hourly basis) in fact what I noticed is that overall for the job the rates were the same. That is to say, the chap charging triple rates was definitely not billing for every hour, whereas the one with the lower rates was. So in the end, on a given project, the amount they each billed out came out the same.

What’s important is the value. They both provided us with equal and great value. However they worked out the math is up to them. How we dealt with the unknown is to put milestone and caps in place. ie: when you’ve reached x amount of hours = $1k let us know, before we start piling on more feature requests and then we’ll see if it’s worth it, and then we can translate that to the client. If they have a super small budget, it won’t be worth it. If they have some latitude, but want to control costs, they can be happy knowing the details.

I’ve seen website designers say, well “we can design a site for $2,000 or you can add (insert x amount of zeroes)  and we can design that too.” Which, I know really only irritates clients, and yet of course it is truthful. I do wonder however, about such a range. If you’re used to doing sites for less than $10K can you really and truly handle a $100K project just like that? Bring it on!😉  Chances are you don’t immediately have the resources available to scale up to that size. Which doesn’t mean you can’t, just that if you’re honest with yourself, your small company (2-5 employees eg) isn’t really competing with an ad agency that offers services in London, New York and Dubai, and employs 500 people.

If a designer (or coach, or photographer) doesn’t immediately reveal their prices on their website, it might be because the reverse question should be openly asked to potential clients – what is your budget? No beating around the bush, no apology. A knowledgeable designer should not respond to the answer, “About $10K” with a quote that neatly caps out at $9,900 and explains nothing. Add (or subtract) zeroes as you wish. Ultimately the sharing of pricing will come with a list of features attached.  You want to save $2K – dump the customized widget that you think is really cool, but ultimately isn’t going to help your business.

Mini update 2021

Reading these thoughts now reminds me that things always shift. I used to see frequent pricing for site-maintenance (specifically WordPress) in the $25 – $99 per month range. Now I see that AI handles the job, and it’s $8/ month. There’s absolutely zero point trying to compete with AI. Unless you’re truly trying to differentiate the hands-on / eyes-on the page service. Most companies would have that sorted in-house though, no?

Filed Under: General, Work Tagged With: money, pricing, value, website costs

Underwater Chinatown

November 2, 2016 by MlleD

009-uwc-fp2

Artists Deanne Achong and Faith Moosang have produced an interactive website that peeks into the history of Cantonese opera and theatres in Vancouver’s Chinatown at the turn of the 20th century. Various stories from the time (1890s – 1920s) are presented using altered archival imagery, film and audio, newspapers and historical documents, creating a visceral sense of the theatrical community in the context of the time and place. Three major opera houses and several “Underwater Theatres” house the immersive narrative.

The project was commissioned by Cinevolution Media Arts Society and can be viewed at underwaterchinatown.com

Underwater Chinatown
Underwater Chinatown
Underwater Chinatown
Underwater Chinatown - Sing Kew Episode
Underwater Chinatown - The Contract
Underwater Chinatown - Underwater Theatres
Underwater Chinatown - Sing Ping Evidence
Underwater Chinatown - Opera Brochures

Role/Tasks

Website Design
Website Development – Custom Theme
Graphic Design
Archival Research
Project Management
Collaborative Process

p.s. It’s odd to write about oneself in the third person. There were many aspects of this project that were quite engaging to work on, both from a coding point of view and an artist pov. As an artist, one of the sections that I was very engaged with was The Actors – exploring the gruelling conditions that actors/actresses faced in the early 1900s when coming to Vancouver to perform at the Opera House. From a coding perspective, getting the fading and scrolling as well as the multiple background images working, and figuring out how and where to pull up the range of content was quite challenging and rewarding.” — Deanne Achong

Filed Under: Work Tagged With: archival, art project, commission, history, net art, Underwater Chinatown

Pier D – A Public Art Project

September 27, 2016 by MlleD

007_achong_pierd_verticalweb

PIER D – A public art project by Deanne Achong (principal at Dia Media). On till the first week in October, 2016, Georgia and Granville Street – Vancouver City Centre skytrain.

Pier D  looks at a specific historic moment in the life of the city’s port— when, on the afternoon of July 27, 1938, a four alarm fire broke out on CPR’s Pier D in Vancouver, BC. After the fire, the pier was never rebuilt, representing a moment of rupture for the artist. The ‘portholes’ present a central image shot by the artist showing where the pier used to be, book-ended by two altered archival images of the 1938 fire.

Their is a QR code installed in one of the windows, that links to a daily (for the duration of the installation) blog that accompanies the site, matching the dates exactly in a happy coincidence. ie:  September 27th was also a Tuesday in 1938. Some posts are “QR only” meaning they do not get transmitted to the blog and exist in the ephemeral moment of the specific day they were on the QR code.

The artwork is installed at the Canada Line Skytrain Windows on Georgia and Granville Streets from May 16th to October 16, 2016. It is  commissioned by the City of Vancouver’s public art program, as part of their Coastal 25th anniversary project.

More about Pier D project | Pier D QR blog [set in 1938]

004_achong_pierd_viewfromleft_72

Filed Under: Work Tagged With: art, blog, other work, public art

Recent Work

September 16, 2016 by MzD

clientele-galerieblogdh

Two recent site launches.
David Harding | Violist, Professor, Chamber Musician

 

clientele-galerieblogspc

SOUTHPIER CAPTIAL INC – A Venture Capital Firm in Toronto/Oakville, Ontario.

 

Filed Under: Work Tagged With: updates, websites, work

Old Websites – Are They Obsolete or Not?

November 8, 2013 by MzD

What To Do With Old Websites – Retire or Realign…

A few years ago, a friend of mine announced she might retire as an artist, at the ripe old age of 36. Another friend back East made a similar pronouncement, although he was a few years older than her. Neither have retired, but both took a hiatus. I recently remembered their dramatic statements and started thinking about retirement of a different sort.

For just over 10 years, from 1999-2010 I was very active in the net-art community, producing dozens of art websites. If the lifespan of a website is akin to the doggie years metaphor (1 dog year = 7 human years ), then these sites are seriously out of date.  Last year, in 2012 I created a year-long daily photographic blog [The Obsolescence Project], considering things that were out of date, but I (gasp) used a free wordpress.com site and thus didn’t design the site, so I exclude it from these musings.

Currently I have about six public web projects that are still active online (there are more, but they were produced anonymously, which is another story, so they can choose their own blissful retirement). Almost all of the sites rely partially on Flash, some completely. Flash is basically obsolete. While not technically so, especially where compiled code (as opposed to visible html5 code) is desired, and for games, for projects I’m referring to it is done and dusted. Those sites just aren’t viewable on the iPhone, iPad and who knows where else. So I have to make a decision. Do I retire these sites completely – press delete – and leave documentation (screenshots/text) behind, or is there a way to re-align them with today’s contemporary web standards?

3 Case Studies:

  • pinch
    Screenshot from Excerpts From An Archive

    Excerpts from An Archive, 2001) is partly related to how one searched the web in 2001. Excerpts considers the nature of digital archives, history and fiction. Hand-coded with HTML using tables! At that time I used to get emails from folks asking me for information about their relatives – it was quite touching. The site only uses a wee bit of Flash, so it still hangs together. But it’s not mobile-responsive, it’s looks quite small – in those days you had to be quite conservative with images, dial-up internet might have even still be around, can’t remember.

  • Translations/Traductions
    Screen Shot of Translations/Traductions: L’Historia Mi Absolvera

    Translations/Traductions – produced as a result of a residency at La Chambre Blanche in Quebec City, a series of Flash vignettes created from open source archival movies and texts. Texts translated in google, imagery ‘translated’ (vectorized) in Flash. Blend of interactive and non-interactive animations. 2007 launch date. This one is all Flash – hence invisible on many (read Apple) mobile platforms (including the iPad).

  • Screen shot of Bird
    Screen shot of Bird

    Bird (2004) – A petit homage to Dizzy Gillespie + Charlie Bird Parker. This one is all Flash too. Looking back, I have a fondness for the effort that it took to create. The excerpt from the song repeats and the archival video that has been modified shifts each time. Does nostalgia merit a redesign?

STATUS PLAN

Excerpts from An Archive – This site gets a lot of traction. It has been featured in two books, one grad thesis, and various festivals. It merits a re-design/re-alignment to bring it up to speed. However, some of the little nifty (in 2001 terms) features that were part of it will just have to be lost. This also means a loss (which is already there) of some of the internal logic. C’est la vie.

Translations/Traductions: There are five animations which each are their own story. I still like them.
The non-interactive ones I will look at converting to video. The interactive ones, like the one I featured will, alas, have to stay as is. I don’t see how html5 can handle it all. Of course, I’m open to suggestion. Put up stills for those who can’t see Flash.

Bird: Given this one is all Flash, but non-interactive, it could easily be reborn as a video. The only loss would be the full scalability that the vector format allows. There would a gain too – in that viewers could pause to actually read the text that scrolls by, I didn’t fully recognize the speed then.

Should I stay or should I go

FINAL THOUGHTS

The three other still live sites I haven’t mentioned are probably going to shift towards documentation only, as their internal logic involved a process of getting input from the public and that process is done.

My rationale for choosing to resuscitate, to whatever degree, these sites has a lot to do with perceived value. Do I still think these works have any value to me as an artist? With the Archives, given that it is still out there, and receives active traffic, it’s not really a question of should, but of when and how.

For TT and Bird, it’s more of a personal reason – ie: I like them, they stay.

For the rest, if I had more time/energy/_______, I might revamp them. But probably it’s best to document, archive and let them gracefully fade away.

If you have old (or ancient) sites that you are wondering if they should be re-purposed for the “mobile web”, here are three questions to ask to help you decide:

  1. Does the site still receive any traffic?
  2. Does it still speak to the heart of your practice/business?
  3. What technologies does it use and how challenging would it be to migrate them?

If the answer to 1 is zero, it’s probably easiest to delete. It’s done, then it’s no longer clutter. Documentation is always a good idea (copy as text, or take screen shots).
If it’s yes, that’s a good hint to bring it up to speed.

If the answer to 2 is no, then I vote for document and delete. Again, why have stuff out there that is attracting people who are interested in content that is obsolete to you.
If it’s yes, that’s probably the most important reason to import it to a new format.

For number 3, technologies: Depending on the type of content, you’re either in for a fairly easy, smooth transition or in for a rocky ride if the content is video in some archaic format and you no longer have the original files (or the original files are no longer readable!) or if it uses Flash animations etc, then the amount of time it will take to re-format creeps up and up. Then you have to ask yourself if you really have the time / money / interest in this thing they call the mobile web.

p.s. Always document.

Filed Under: Techie, Work Tagged With: adaptation, art, change, decisions, digital clutter, Flash, mobile, mobile web, net art, realign, redesign, retirement, technology, time, web design standards, website redesign

Site re-launch

September 4, 2013 by MzD

Avian Site

We re-launched The Center For Avian and Exotic Medicine, a speciality veterinary hospital in New York, NY. New features include: replacing most of the pdf forms with online forms, mobile-ready responsive website, re-organization of content to feature their extensive articles and resources. If you have a bearded dragon that needs treatment and you live in NYC, head on over to the CAEM!

Filed Under: Work Tagged With: clients, genesis, mobile, projects, responsive, site design, website design, website launch, wordpress

Project Obso – new blog

February 8, 2012 by MzD

I’ve started a 30(+) day blog about obsolescence. Visit The Obsolescence Project>

 

 

Filed Under: Work Tagged With: art, art blog, blogging, obsolescence, photo blog, photography

Black Out Day

January 18, 2012 by MzD

Happy to have participated in the good fight. 8 sites blacked out today – 2 ours (art & this site), the rest clients and partners.

Had fun with some of the pages – below my art site,  and one of our favourite clients –  Animal General.

Mona's Anti-Sopa
Mona's Anti-Sopa too

Cats Can See in the Dark - we can't

Filed Under: Work Tagged With: anti-sopa, blackout, joyful, mona lisa, portfolio, sopa, work

Edward Hopper and Josephine

January 14, 2012 by MzD

I enjoyed Edward Hopper’s work quite a bit as an undergraduate in art school. Who doesn’t like the moody, dark, impenetrable scenes he pictured of America’s depression and it’s aftermath? Especially when you’re 22.

“New York Movie” - 1939

Don’t get me wrong. I still love his work – his use of colour in particular. He knew how to paint light. What I didn’t know was his wife’s name was Josephine, and that she was also a painter. Amazing what tidbits an education leaves out. How did I come to know about her?

Fonts.  Yep. While trying to come about with something different (yet quick) for the front page of this much neglected site (the old adage about the shoemaker’s son and no shoes) I thought I’d just dig into the font collection I acquired a few years ago. And right there below Hopper > Edward, was Hopper > Josephine.

According to the wiki, her work Jo’s watercolor Movie Theater—Gloucester influenced Edward’s interest in theatres. A quick (is there any other type) google search did not produce any images, sadly.

Filed Under: Work Tagged With: about, art, fonts, hopper

Are you mobile friendly?

Recently

  • Pricing – to Share or Not to Share
  • Comments Off … Radio Silence
  • Why Is It So Challenging To Estimate Time?
  • 2017 Word of The Year
  • End of Year Lists
Create your own visual style... let it be unique for yourself and yet identifiable for others. —Orson Welles

The Vault

  • Home
  • Journal

© 2025 · Dia Media | Website Strategy & Design in Vancouver, BC